For example it is bad thing to have a variable and function named the same way, I expect the same thing might happen with CFC. It was wired for me to find out one day that my functions stopped to work ... then I found a variable with the same name - variable takes higher preference than function name. In another instance there was no variable but a query .. same deal .. then in another instance there was no conflict at all but it didn't work, renaming fixed it. I think the translation from CF to java might not be perfect in all instances under all wired circumstances.
Thus, try changing the CFC name and maybe even location (full path). I bet it will solve the problem of CFC type but create another related to a new name.
The idea of a mapping created by some user might be getting you closer to the root of the problem, I don't know.
TK
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Davis
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: Wierd CFC Path Problem - Question on CFC types (HELP!!)
Unfortunately I can't - the production server is hosted/shared
(CrystalTech.com). But I don't think this is the case anyway - it just
doesn't "feel" like a server issue. I can create new CFCs, change those
I have, and everything works: I just get the wrong type back.
They believe that this is coding issue (of course) and I beleive that it
must be a server issue (since it worked yesterday). A new mapping or
something COULD have messed thing up, but the behavior is very odd: it
does find MY CFC (not another one or have trouble finding it as I think
a mapping problem would). But the type of the CFC is the generic name
only, not the fully qualified name - depsite the fact that I can only
call the CFC with a fully qualified name.
My CFCs are in "com.depressedpress." - what if another customer created
a mapping to "com"? I would expect to have an error on initialization,
right? Or could it somehow be finding my CFC in a different way and
dropping the name as it found it?
Should I be using "com.depressedpress" at all or maybe something more
like "com_depressedpress" (so that "com" isn't the mapped folder...)?
I'm going crazy on this one...
Thanks,
Jim Davis
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Wierd CFC Path Problem - Question on CFC types (HELP!!)
Have you tried restarting both servers? It solved many strange problems
for me like invisible templates etc.
TK
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Davis
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:42 PM
Subject: RE: Wierd CFC Path Problem - Question on CFC types (HELP!!)
Sorry - I'm starting to get frantic on this one.
When I call:
<cfdump var="#CreateObject('Component',
'com.Depressedpress.DPDataSource')#">
I get back a type of "DPDataSource" but I get an error if I try:
<cfdump var="#CreateObject('Component', 'DPDataSource')#">
How could this happen? With the same code the problem only occurs in
production (hosted at CrystalTech.net) not on Develoment (I've tried
to
mimic the environments as closely as possible, both CFMX 6.1). It had
worked on production until sometime yesterday.
Any ideas at all one what could cause this? Even crazy ones. I'm
facing
a nasty evening if I can't figure this out.
Jim Davis
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Wierd CFC Path Problem - Question on CFC types
I'm now seeing my problem in most of my CFCs - but only on the
production (hosted) server.
For example if I call:
<cfdump var="#CreateObject('Component',
'com.Depressedpress.DPEvents.Festival')#">
The resulting component is of type "Festival", not
"com.Depressedpress.DPEvents.Festival"
Since I'm specifying the full path in my create, how could it get
truncated? I would think that the only way to get truncated to the
base
name would be for a mapping to that specific folder to be in effect -
is
that true?
It seems that a mapping to the "com" folder wouldn't do it, for
example.
How can this occur (when I call a fully qualified type and it returns
an
unqualified, generic type)?
Jim Davis
_____
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
