> could be deemed to have "performance" issues.��But for a free text
> search over a 10,000 record collection for the average CF app you'd be
> hard pushed to make Verity break sweat.
>
Your the one who made the assumption that someone's implementation is
wrong because Verity wasn't performing well for them. I simply pointing
out that the person isn't alone in their findings, which isn't vague at
all.
> In fact, I have never seen an Apache project Lucene solution on a
> single
> server that outperformed that of the Verity solution.��Truth be known
> I've never had the chance to compare them in that way.��But that's my
> point -- what a silly response.
>
I can't really help that you don't do your homework and learn about all
of the available tools to determine their strengths and weaknesses. I'm
sure your clients would appreciate knowing that. But silly me for
suggesting that their may be another way to solve a problem then what
is directly available in ColdFusion.
> You've always been a master sophist, Matt.��Verity is a solution that
> has worked hand in hand with CF since the beginning of time.��It's
> hardly non-sensical to suggest that it's more likely the Verity
> implementation is not optimal than Verity itself is broken.
>
Verity's history with CF has no bering on how well it performs compared
to other solutions that can be used with CF. Using that logic all CF
applications would be built using Pointbase since it ships with CF as
opposed to Oracle or some other enterprise database.
Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
(888) 408-0900 x901
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
