Good to know, thanks.  I'm kind of preparing myself for a project that requires tiny devices access but it's very early stage right now.

Don

>As others have said, if your handheld uses "real" browser that consumes
>html, then you just use CF as normal.
>
>Some things to keep in mind are that IE on a PocketPC is a strange beast and
>that the capabilities recently changed significantly with the release of
>Windows Mobile 2003. Prior to the 2003 OS, the PocketIE was basically just
>the IE 3 codebase. That means HTML3.2 and no CSS support. The new 2003 OS
>updated PocketIE to support CSS, but I haven't seen a full breakdown of how
>well it supports it. I've read that "float" isn't there.
>
>There are also alternate browsers out there for the PocketPC, including
>NetFront which is on the Clie and something called Thunderhawk. And then, of
>course, there's the entire non-Pocket PC market of PDAs and cellphones.
>
>The most common suggestion I've seen for devloping for handheld browsers is
>to create a completely CSS based site, and then either design a minimalist
>CSS display or even trick it to completely hide the CSS display and revert
>to an unformatted site. Not pretty, but more useable than a design you can't
>use at all.
>
>Also, consider Flash RIAs. Maybe it's just some specific features of your
>site that you will make available, and those can be best handled by
>distributing the content in a different way. Flash RIAs can run on PocketPC,
>Palm and even some cellphones and their implementation is more consistent.
>
>Good luck.
>
>-Kevin
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Chunshen (Don) Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:59 AM
>Subject: Re:CF & pda types of devices
>
>
>> Personally in general I would prefer to use ONE for the other option would
>require much more time/efforts and cost for essentially the same thing.  And
>I would think that browser for PDA type of device would simplify data
>display and navigation whenever possible as Thomas mentioned.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> >so how would one detect what kind of device ( other than pc ) was
>accessing
>> >my site? would it just be a matter of creating a link ( flash site here |
>> >xhtml site here | PDA xhtml site here | WML site here )
>> >
>> >
>> >>From: Thomas Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>Subject: Re: CF & pda types of devices
>> >>Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:23:43 +0000
>> >>MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >>Received: from houseoffusion.com ([64.118.64.245]) by mc7-f6.hotmail.com
>> >>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:32:53 -0800
>> >>Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOSTwith ESMTP id
>> >>1E50022862FD7D47AF87ADCF804B9FE9Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:25:43 -0500
>> >>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jH0WUrlLkM9Hj8F8ul61g5l
>> >>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>Precedence: bulk
>> >>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2003 16:32:57.0379 (UTC)
>> >>FILETIME=[EFEA9730:01C3BDA8]
>> >>
>> >>On Monday 08 Dec 2003 16:17 pm, Dan Farmer wrote:
>> >> > Interesting, do those devices use HTML or WML ?
>> >>
>> >>My P900 does both - it runs Opera for (X)HTML for instance :-)
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>Tom Chiverton
>> >>Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
>> >>
>> >>Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
>> >>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>BlueFinger Limited
>> >>Underwood Business Park
>> >>Wookey Hole Road, WELLS. BA5 1AF
>> >>Tel: +44 (0)1749 834900
>> >>Fax: +44 (0)1749 834901
>> >>web: www.bluefinger.com
>> >>Company Reg No: 4209395 Registered Office: 2 Temple Back East, Temple
>> >>Quay, BRISTOL. BS1 6EG.
>> >>*** This E-mail contains confidential information for the addressee
>> >>only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
>> >>immediately. You should not use, disclose, distribute or copy this
>> >>communication if received in error. No binding contract will result from
>> >>this e-mail until such time as a written document is signed on behalf of
>> >>the company. BlueFinger Limited cannot accept responsibility for the
>> >>completeness or accuracy of this message as it has been transmitted over
>> >>public networks.***
>> >>
>> >>
>>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to