that's fine, I have  2.6ghz processor with 1gb ram, and dwmx cant touch hs+
as far as speed goes.... not even a close race.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Joining the dark side - using DWMX

> CFS5 Kicks DWMX ass anytime. It is faster and more stable. I don't
> care what hardware you are on - the bottom line is that
> CFS5 is faster than DWMX on any hardware.

We're talking about a text editor, not a compiler. How fast does it have to
be? On my laptop (which is hardly a blazing machine) Dreamweaver MX 2004
runs well enough that it doesn't slow me down any.

In exchange, it gives me a usable design view, templates, an incredibly
powerful search and replace interface, and all sorts of other stuff I find
very helpful.

There are plenty of things I don't like about Dreamweaver, but they're
outweighed by the good things in my opinion. For that matter, there were
plenty of things I didn't like about CF Studio - it's not like that was
God's gift to text editing, either.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to