"The SOAP approach results in larger payloads and greater CPU processing, resulting from the XML Schema validation and XML parsing. The Flash Remoting approach benefits from a binary representation of request/response as well as the invocation- batching feature. For any application that requires moderate to high remote invocation volume and/or that involves complex data types and large arrays, Flash Remoting is a better fit. "
Because remoting uses AMF (ActionScript Message Format), which is a binary protocol, Flash Remoting will always be faster and less memory intensive than text-heavy xml data. Memory leak or not.
-d
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: Flash Remoting to CF
I'm not even sure why they bothered to run this. I'm sure the situation will change once the memory leak is fixed.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darron J. Schall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:35 pm
Subject: Re: Flash Remoting to CF
> The article can be found by clicking around on sys-con's mxdj page
>
> magazine:http://www.sys-con.com/mx/
> article: http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=37919&DE=1#RES
>
> I highly suggest getting a print copy - the results are shown as
> charts which don't seem to be viewable in the online version of
> the article.
>
> -d
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
