I said if, im neither a java or a c++ programmer.

:)

i only intended to post the one response, but as you probably all know,
it gets kinda addicting once you feel you're on a roll.

-Tim

Cantrell, Adam wrote:

> "If I were an OOP programmer using Java and C++ and someone told me that
> other people could callthemselves OOP programmers simply because they
> can create "objects" with HTML. I'd be kinda MAD."
>
> "btw im not getting upset"
>
> I see we now have to have an argument over the difference between mad and
> upset :)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Hanbey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:53 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Cold Fusion Web Developer/Programmer Position - Kansas City A
> rea
>
> Right but it appears you are trying to divide and conquer and that just
> isn't going to work.
>
> Object Oriented programming is what it is... to go and take oriented out
> of it and try and attack it from that angle you are taking yourself away
> from the concept.
>
> its like taking  Java Developer.  and turning into someone who develops
> coffee.
>
> object oriented programming is what it is.  there isn't any conforming
> needed. because they aren't objects.
>
> btw im not getting upset,i just have an opinion and am just expressing
> it and just because someone programs in Cold Fusion as oppose to  C++  
> doesnt make them any less of a programmer/developer. As my experience
> atschool, C/C++ programmers are continuing  to try and distinguish
> themselves from web developers, which is a whole new topic in itself and
> NOT what I am trying to do here. And the growing trend of web
> programming isn't "real" programming is,frankly,retarded.
>
> -tim
>
> Cantrell, Adam wrote:
>
> > If god didn't intend for us to eat meat, then why would he have
> called it
> > meat?
> >
> > :)
> >
> > Ok, so then we should call CFC's MOP then? Modular Oriented
> Programming? I
> > can deal with that. Module/Object - ok I guess I'm just not that
> anal. My
> > beef is with the 'oriented', you're description isn't 'oriented', it's
> > 'conform to this definition or you're wrong, stop thinking of what the
> > high-level purpose of this is'. I'll call it whatever people like
> though.
> > It's like getting upset over developer or programmer. I call myself
> > glorified secretary now so not to offend anyone.
> >
> > Adam.
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to