> > I never had the need to look at the internals of the CFCexplorer, sorry.
> > Of course, you could look at the source code (well it's encrypted...)
>
> Is MX's template encryption any better than previous versions ?

No :-)))

> I suspect CFCexplorer works by creating an instance of the object and
trawling
> the meta-data - it isn't very hard.

No, it's not

Something similar (better actually) is available here:

http://www.bpurcell.org/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=956

----------------------------
Massimo Foti
http://www.massimocorner.com

Co-Author of Dreamweaver MX 2004 Magic:
http://www.dwmagic.com/
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to