udf cfc. I like it because it simple.
-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 10:34 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFC problems - portability workaround
Why would you want to exend a UDF CFC? I don't grok OOP very well
myself,
but it is my understanding you only use extends/inheritance when you
have a
"IS A" relationship. Obviously your CFC is just using the UDF CFC for
support functions and the like, and it would seem like a better idea to
simply make an instance of the CFC inside the CFC itself.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
