For me they lost credibility when I viewed the source and saw tables for all layout... :P

It is an interesting read though. Hasn't MM always stated that FR was a better performer?

Calvin
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Matt Liotta
  To: CF-Talk
  Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 11:58 AM
  Subject: Re: Web Services vs. Remoting - Performance Tests?

  That is not an independent benchmark and even if it was it doesn't take
  into account HTTP compression. Remember, FlashOrb is a product that
  relies on Flash Remoting, so there is some bias there.

  -Matt

  On Jan 30, 2004, at 2:42 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:

  > Here's an independant benchmark:
  > http://www.flashorb.com/articles/soap_vs_flash_remoting_benchmark.shtml
  >
  >
  > But more importantly, all the flash remoting servers can invoke methods
  > on webserices and return the results to the flash client in a binary
  > format. This seems to be forgotton by most for some reason. The only
  > difference, the webservice is being deserialized on the server instead
  > of the client. This is a good thing. MM is pushing clientside
  > webservice
  > deserialization for those who do not have access to their server. At
  > least, thats the only reason I can see why you'd use it. Of course, if
  > you don't have access to the server publishing the webservice I doubt
  > you can change the crossdomain.xml and if you can't change that then
  > you
  > can't consume any remote service from flash.  The moral of the story?
  > Native client web services api looks good on the box and ppl buy into
  > it.
  >
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > Sent: January 30, 2004 7:05 AM
  > To: CF-Talk
  > Subject: Re: Web Services vs. Remoting - Performance Tests?
  >
  > My tests have shown that Flash Remoting is significantly faster for
  > large amounts of data, but only when HTTP compression is not used with
  > SOAP. I believe that SOAP plug HTTP compression strikes the right
  > balance of standards and performance.
  >
  > -Matt
  >
  > On Jan 30, 2004, at 9:36 AM, Burns, John wrote:
  >
  > > Has anyone seen real, objective performance tests done on web
  > services
  > > and flash remoting that compare the speed differences and would help
  > me
  > > make a choice on whether it's just as easy to use web services in
  > Flash
  > > as opposed to remoting?  I know that technically remoting is faster,
  > > but
  > > I'm curious by how much.  Any info would be great.  Thanks!
  > >
  > >
  > > John Burns
  > >
  >   _____
  >
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to