> Macromedia would be better off using no framework at all. Let's face
> it, a framework is just a loosely connected group of ideas anyways,
> that offers a temporary development efficency until something new
> comes along.
I guess frameworks mean different things to different people.
Personally, I can't imagine building any application without some sort
of framework, even a very small and lightweight one. I have found that
frameworks (not specifically Mach II, but frameworks in general) make
development much more efficient, and applications easier to extend and
maintain. However, this should not be interpreted as a Macromedia
endorsement for frameworks in general. :)
Christian
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
