framework called Dylan65. Mach-II is being used for some very specific
applications. Please bother to read Sean Corfields blog. For example:
http://www.corfield.org/blog/past/2003_11.html#000203
Dylan65 was released to production in Feb 2003. How long do people
think MM has been running on CFMX???
Is using Mach-II for production at MM an endorsement of the technology?
Of course -- officially or unofficially, who cares? It appears to work
there, and appears to work well for what they want. Mach-II follows a
standard design pattern -- if they wanted that design pattern should
they build it again or contribute to an existing community group that
has already got much of the way?? Would any other commercial team of
developers have done differently??
-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
