It's reaching, but it might be the collation on the tables.  Check it out.

----- Original Message -----
From: brobborb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, March 1, 2004 2:45 pm
Subject: Re: OT:  migrating to SQL Server 2000

> I just did a little test.  I created a regular table, with one
> field.  I used the Query Analyzer to insert 500 rows.  took about
> 4 seconds.  
>
> In SQL 7, i did the same thing, except with 1000 rows.  The
> results showed up in a split second.
>
>
> So far i know this (i hope i'm right!)
>
> It's not a coldfusion compatibility problem
> It's not a crappy computer problem (the one running 2000 is
> 2.8ghz, the one running SQL 7 is 900mhz)
> It's not an indexing problem
> No problems with SELECT statements.  Works fine, works great.
> PROBLEMS with INSERT statements
>
>
> This is how simple the insert statement is (500 times)....INSERT
> INTO testy(name) VALUES ("TEST000000000000000001")
>
> maybe there's something wrong with that insert thats causing SQL
> 2000 to act funny :(
>
> I hate it when I dont know what the problem is!  You feel so
> helpless :( haha  I am sure this is fixable because it has to be
> maybe we'll have torequest a different CD!
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Rob
>  To: CF-Talk
>  Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:40 PM
>  Subject: Re: OT: migrating to SQL Server 2000
>
>
>  Did your indexes come over ok? There is a setting somewhere on 7 I
>  believe when moving data if you do not say you want indexes to
> go they
>  wont. That could impact performace (more on selects I would
> imagine).  Anyway I have done at least 3 SQL7 -> SQL2000 and there
> were a few minor
>  problems (and very obscure syntax changes) but not much to write
> home  about.
>
>  On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 13:16, brobborb wrote:
>  > Is there a HUGE difference between SQL 7 and SQL 2000???  
> Because 2000 is just running really slow and we can't figure out
> why.  Is there a difference in syntax or something?  On SQL 7 a
> multiple insert query (400 inserts) finished in 400ms.  in 2000,
> same query, but in 7 SECONDS!!!
>  >
>  > i've google some information and it seem others have come
> across this problem, but we could not fix ours to work correctly.  
> I hope this is fixable :(
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to