After having been asked to extend one too many spaghetti-code
procedural applications, I have started to suspect that there *is*
something to the idea of OO. I am now anxious to try this out
(probably with Mach-II, for lack of a better idea), but I am concerned
that some of my "OOAD using UML" training will become invalidated by
CFCs' incomplete implementation of OO.

My question is pretty vague at this point, but I'm wondering what to
look out for, with regard to OOAD and its implementation in CFCs.
Also, I'm wondering if there's some sort of "Java as the Model" /
"CFMX as the View and Controller" approach that I should consider
(what ever became of Mach-II for Java, BTW?)

Another side question: Can anyone recommend any references for how to
go about implementing the Class Model in code (as well as its
interaction with RDB-persisted data)?

Any feedback, links, suggested reading, etc., is appreciated.

Thanks,
Jamie
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to