Just wondering if you were able to find that white paper. If so, I can
post my email address. Our software architect wants to wrap CFSTOREDPROC
with a CFX and use a JDBC driver that supports named parameters.
Thanks..
>> I am working on a migration from CF5 to MX. I was working on
>> determining how much effort would be involved in fixing our
>> stored procedure calls (since named parameters are no longer
>> supported). I was curious as to the different techniques
>> people used to fix their proc calls. Brute force? Replacing
>> CFSTOREDPROC with a CFX? Other ideas? There are different
>> camps in our office and I am wondering what other people on
>> the list did?
>
>We never used named parameters, so it was never a problem. However, at our
>users group, someone gave a very interesting presentation on how they wrote
>something to fix all their stored procedures to address this exact issue.
>I'll see if I can track that down.
>
>Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
>http://www.figleaf.com/
>phone: 202-797-5496
>fax: 202-797-5444
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
