Nice shot Dave, bull's-eye. Pascal's recommendation and yours both worked. I
am not sure which one is more efficient, but my guess is that the
difference, if any, is negligible.. And unless you're a performance tuning
animal, not sure it matters.  :-)

Thanks!

Mike

> This is just a shot in the dark, but you might try using the
> URLEncodedFormat function on the data.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to