that we use in proofs. A good definition captures the concept that it is
defining well, bad one does not. Bottom line is you can define web site as
pigs that fly and it will be a valid definition. In fact I think that even
today (or at least 2 years ago) the question of 0 (zero) being a Natural
number or not was not uniformly accepted. Different professors used
different definitions, which is OK (however I sure hope one day they will go
one way or the other). I am in the camp that says 0 is Natural. For me
having no money is a natural state :)
TK
[Tom Kitta]
-----Original Message-----
From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 7:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: Securing CF Apps.
What a weak argument. Prove to me that is the definition of a web site.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:38 pm
Subject: RE: Securing CF Apps.
> I think something used to either sell products on the web, or provide
> information on the web is a site. Now the site might be
> controlled by a
> back end content management system, or some sort of inventory
> application,but the rest of it is a web site.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
