Thanks.  I get your point.  Essentially after posting I've come up with an effective, alternative solution.

>I don't think that's how base 64 encoding works. To the best of my
>knowledge, base 64 encoding simply uses a subset of ASCII characters to
>represent binary data. I could type a bunch of characters in using those
>characters, and convert it to binary data, although it might not represent
>something useful.
>
>I'm oversimplifying a bit here, I suspect, since there are limitations on
>the number of characters per line requiring hard returns within the data,
>you'd have a certain number of characters, and so on, but the fundamental
>problem remains, I think.
>
>Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
>http://www.figleaf.com/
>phone: 202-797-5496
>fax: 202-797-5444
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to