tougher. There's a lot of new stuff (especially in the CF Administrator)
If it's not a necessity to go to SQL right now, I'd go for MX. You can
do CF without SQL, but if you're a SQL brainiac and can't manage your
CF, it doesn't do you much good.
My $0.02
John Burns
-----Original Message-----
From: Claremont, Timothy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Do I need to be retrained?
I have about five years of experience with CF 4.5 both as a developer
and an administrator. However, I have not used either for about a year
now.
My new employer has embraced the CF route, and therefore I am planning
an order for MX and a new server.
My question is, if I were to pick a training order, should I go for SQL
Server first (which I am weak in) or go for MX training first (no
experience).
My initial plan is to start with our well designed Access tables. I
developed the Access tables with migrating to SQL Server in mind.
Can I get by fairly well on my 4.5 experience, or will I immediately be
"in the hole"?
Thanks!
Tim
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
