> I also think it is funny that they didn't include php or asp (non-.net).
> I would think that php would be far more popular than CF or ASP.net.

Now I'm as big of a fan of CF any anyone is, but when I went looking for
evidence against this on Netcraft I found the following:

http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/30/php_growing_surprisingly_strong
ly_on_windows.html
"Although PHP is universally thought of as implying Linux, Apache and MySQL,
nearly 7% of PHP sites [when counting by ip address] run on Windows. This
has doubled over the last year, and on its current growth trajectory PHP
will overtake Cold Fusion as the most popular non-Microsoft scripting
language used on Windows during the next year."

Of course number of sites != popularity and number of sites != number of
developers.  Interesting though...

-Cameron

-----------------
Cameron Childress
Sumo Consulting Inc
---
land:  858.509.3098
cell:  678.637.5072
aim:   cameroncf
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: Hugo Ahlenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 7:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Popularity of Cold Fusion

I also think it is funny that they didn't include php or asp (non-.net).
I would think that php would be far more popular than CF or ASP.net.

/Hugo

-------------------------------------------------------------
Hugo Ahlenius                  E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project Officer                Phone:            +46 8 230460
UNEP GRID-Arendal              Fax:              +46 8 230441
Stockholm Office               Mobile:         +46 733 467111
                               WWW:       http://www.grida.no
-------------------------------------------------------------

| -----Original Message-----
| From: Paul Vernon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 13:16
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: Popularity of Cold Fusion
|
| > not sure how reliable the survey is given the statement:
| >
| > "Other large enterprises utilising ASP.NET include .... British
| > <http://www.bt.com/> Telecom ...."
| >
| > but a visit to bt.com defaults to:
| >
| > http://www.bt.com/index.jsp
|
|
| now that is a very good point!
|
| Paul
|
|
|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to