It could be that I imagined things, but my tickcount was lower with more
code in cfscript.  I didn't think it would make a difference, but I went
with it.


Kevin


  _____  

From: Venable, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion Coding Contest


Is this still true? I was inder the impression that since CFMX compiles
everything beforehand the performance gains that you used to get with
CFSCRIPT are no longer there. Am I wrong about that?

John Venable

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion Coding Contest

Hmmm, it looks like there are going to be a lot of 'shortest path'
algorithm
implementations. I guess to win on speed it should be written in
cfscript as
much as possible.

TK
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:06 PM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: ColdFusion Coding Contest

  Just go to the link Kaz posted earlier and take his code :-)

  > oops. I forgot to send in my entry last time.  Where are the
  > rules so that I can make sure it conforms?
  > DRE
  _____
  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to