On Apr 7, 2004, at 6:48 AM, Samuel R. Neff wrote:

>  I don't see how XUL is an option though except for extreme
> cases--requires
>  FireFox/Mozilla.��Any chance there's an ActiveX renderer for XUL that
> works
>  in IE?��
>
>

Don't know about an ActiveX renderer -- but supposedly XUL has been
submitted for consideration as a standard, (For whatever that is
worth).

I know I can't use OS X Safari with XUL nor Neuromancer, for that
matter.

The most likely solution will be that MACR fixes Flash -- I hope they
do.

Dick
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to