On 8/11/00, Seth Petry-Johnson penned:
>I wrote a little test. I ran a loop 1000 times, each iteration generating a
>random number using the randRange() parameters you mentioned above. On 5
>separate page loads, ALL 1000 numbers were less than 1,736,483,927. If I
>dropped the second parameter to a value within the allowed range, then
>randRange() performed as expected.
Thanks Seth. In fact, after testing a couple more time myself, it ran
back to 9 digits on a couple so I just changed it to a 9 digit range.
--
Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.twcreations.com/
954.721.3452
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
