Why do you say don't use Fusebox 3 on CFMX? Reason I ask is that I
have a Fusebox 3 app running on a CF5 box, but would like to migrate it
to our new CFMX box some time in the future. Have you seen big
performance problems with Fusebox 3 on CFMX? I've heard good things
about Fusebox 4, but have not had a chance to play around with it yet.
--Jeff
Michael T. Tangorre wrote:
> > Thank you, Cameron. Which version of Fusebox do you think I
> > should use? I know it has fusebox 3, 4, and Mach-II, but
> > most people seem to use fusebox 3. Is fusebox 4 and Mach-II
> > harder to use?
>
> Johnny,
>
> Check out the following sites:
>
> www.fusebox.org
> www.mach-ii.com
> www.techspedition.com
>
> You choices are between Fusebox4 and Mach-II. I would not even consider FB3
> unless you are on something other than CFMX. Any hosting solution will work
> for FB4, and I assume for Mach-II as well. I have used FB4 quite extensively
> and would recommend it to you. Play around with both though, Mach-II is
> pretty awesome as well although I have not had a chance to dive into it like
> I have with FB4.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Mike
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
