>So they're shipping with something they're not certified to run correctly.
>Nice. Few vendors are 1.4 certified, BEA being notably absent. I'd expect
>them to hold off on shipping 1.4 pieces until they are (like BEA) or at
>least say it's a preview (like Oracle did until they were certified).
>
>Of course, what MM supports is often weird. For example, when I was looking
>at things a few months back they listed support for CF MX on top of JRun4
>in a RedHat ES environment even though JRun4 didn't support Redhat ES. How
>does that work?
>
Bob,
You're confusing your Java terminology. JDK is not J2EE. This link will
explain it:
http://www.developeriq.com/bulletinboard/active.php?id=1754&uid=1695
However, that being said, the J2SDK is what was shipped with CFMX 6.1, hence
the 1.4.2 version number. J2EE 1.4 was only released a few months ago so
there's no way MX could have implemented the spec.
Regards,
Dave.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
