> URLScan was installed separately - but is not needed on Win
> 2003. According to Microsoft it is an option.
>
> With the proliferation of server attacks, the "worm of the
> week", etc. I tend to err on the side of caution for server
> security.

Windows Server 2003 comes with its own input filter. So far, I've found that
sufficient, but there's a comparison on the MS site between it and URLScan.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to