huh. so I don't have to surround it with cfscript?  How is this different from CFFunction?

>It's very much like an ECMA language.  The biggest difference (off the
>top of my head) is that you use CF comparison operators instead of ECMA
>ones.  That is you use "is" or "eq" instead of "==" and so forth.
>
>You can call it from a CFSET if you want the results to be put in a
>variable:
>
><cfset value = function_name(arguments)>
>
>If you just want them displayed, you can do something like
>
><cfoutput>
>#function_name(arguments)#
></cfoutput>
>
>--Ben Doom
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to