installed as a java app (rather than standalone) it can't use the registery
no matter what, because that wouldn't be platform independent.
On a different note, using the registry for client storage generally isn't a
good idea. Scalability just isn't there compared to a database, there are
hard filesize limitations on the registry, and you can't share the registry
amongst multiple servers.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Howitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:12 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Server discrepancies
>
> We have 4 servers with identical hardware and basic software
> (Win2k). 2 of
> them have adopted the cf.registry file for client storage and
> 2 use the
> windows registry. I understand that cf.registry is the way
> cf simulates the
> windows registry but they are all windows boxes. Has anyone
> experienced
> this? There is a method invoked in one of the jar files or a
> class file (I
> can't remember which) which detects the availability of the
> registry at the
> time of install but the suspicion is that since this was done
> over RDS, this
> might have returned false. Any thoughts?
>
> Adam Howitt
> Photos: http://www.myphotopia.com?sg
> Blog: http://www.knowmysize.com/blog/?sg
>
>
>
> -
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by declude AntiVirus Software]
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
