This is a pretty simple _expression_, and I would doubt the additional
processing needed is noticeable. The reason I suggested it is because
it's the only sure-fire way of grabbing just the number, irregardless of
the preceeding value, respectfully.

George Abraham wrote:

> Is that better performance/resource-wise? Using regular expressions,
> that is?
>
> George
>
> At 11:39 AM 6/11/2004, Dain Anderson wrote:
>  >You could use a little RegEx to do that:
>  >
>  ><CFLOOP LIST="#itemList#" INDEX="i" DELIMITERS=",">
>  >#REReplace(i, "[^0-9]", "", "ALL")#
>  ></CFLOOP>
>  >
>  >-Dain
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to