Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:166641
---
Take a look at the DCMA and see what it has to say about encryption
devices. One could argue RDS is an encrypted protocol, which opens up a
whole can of worms thanks to the DCMA. Clearly the correct course of
action was to contact Macromedia in regard to RDS and they have spoken.

-Matt

On Jun 15, 2004, at 12:02 AM, Paul Kenney wrote:

> Matt,
>
>  Reverse engineering is not a copyright violation if you simply
> duplicate the
>  observed behavior of the protocol using something akin to a packet
>  sniffer--don't look at the Java code.��As for future enhancements to
> RDS?
>  Well, they actually crippled it for CFMX by removing timestamps for
>  individual files so that you can't use DWMX site synchronization with
> it.
>  Remember, they have to support the applications that exist that use it
>  (Homesite+, DWMX, CF Studio) so I doubt too much that any third-party
>  implementation would have too worry about it.��It might not be a
> public
>  protocol, but it is a published one--albiet internally.
>
>  Paul Kenney
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  916-212-4359
>
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:38 PM
>  > To: CF-Talk
>  > Subject: RDS support (was Re: CFEclipse release - beta
>  >
>  >
>  > > We have been talking about reverse engineering RDS
>  > >��(unless macromedia wants to give us the specs :-D), but
>  > >��we are not to sure how great of an idea that is. It is
>  > >��on the list though.
>  > >
>  > Since support for RDS has been request for He3, I thought I
>  > would share
>  > the official response from Macromedia, which is quoted below.
>  >
>  > "The RDS API is used as a mechanism for different Macromedia
> products
>  > to communicate and, as an internal tool, is subject to change
>  > from time
>  > to time as is needed to best serve our customers.� Reverse
>  > engineering
>  > it would not only be a violation of copyright, but would not
>  > necessarily even work as the protocol continues to evolve with our
>  > ongoing efforts at improving our product features for customers."
>  >
>  > -Matt
>  >
>  >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to