string truly unique that can't eventually be figured out. You just make
it as difficult as possible.
Your idea would work, but an image is better because it is compiled. And
flash you're passing the data in somehow that can be caught.
Doug James wrote:
> A thought just struck me so it is a bit off the top of my head, read may
> not be totally thought through.
>
> If one is to believe MM and that 70%+ of the worlds browser have a flash
> plug-in loaded, could one use flash remoting to create a standard flash
> still image then use CF to put random letters on top of the image? Can
> automated scripts decipher flash movies?
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
