I do think Stephen has a point, about learning curve, althought I have
been won over by the easy config as I can port it across development
servers and backup configuration changes

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:30:38 -0700, Barney Boisvert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We've been running CF behind apache for years, with no issues.  Started with
> Apache 1.3 and CF 4.5 (at my current employers), then 2.0 and 6.0, and
> currently running 2.0 and 6.1.  Never had a bit of problems with the setup.
>
> We just cycled CFMX when we applied a large update on June 1, and before
> that the machines and daemons had been running since September of last year
> without interruption.  Hard to argue with that.
>
> MM.com is also running Apache (on Solaris), both pure web server, and
> connected to JRun for serving dynamic content.
>
> Cheers,
> barneyb
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 8:43 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Apache and CF
> >
> > Talking about http://www.linode.com made me think about something. how
> > many people are running CF (5 or MX) on Apache (1 or 2) on production
> > servers? I love apache for my laptop/development environments and I
> > swear by OS X (and swear at PC's!) but I havent come across many
> > production environments using Apache.
> >
> > Any good or bad stories?
> >
> > --
> > Mark Drew
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to