Adrocknaphobia wrote:

> I'm quite suprised this thread hadnt been started yet. I'm pretty sure
> we are allowed to talk about it 'in our own words'. Although I dont
> think I can convey the new gateway functionality nearly as well as
> Ben. But yeah..... excuse the language but there just isnt a better
> way to put. It's bad ass!

The example Ben showed was pretty basic, and functionally possible with
current CF technology.

He did mention something that would not be possible with current CF
technology though - they built a telnet server in entirely CFML.

The possibilities available of having CFML "listen" to a port are pretty
immense.

  - Rick
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to