> Personally I think the lack of nulls in CF is far more
> troublesome than the lack of strong-typing and if I had to prioritize
> them, nulls would be way up near the top of my list, while stong
> typing would be way down toward the bottom.
I've thought the lack of Nulls was strange since my first encounter
with CF 3.0 (!998).
It has always seemed odd that we were spoofing interaction with Null db
fields.
Now, with the ability to closely interact with Java it seems even
odder, that we need to cobble together some kludge to resolve Nulls.
This is one of those annoying things (like alphabetically sorted query
ciomumnList) that you wonder why they just don't fix it.
Mmmm... BD fixed columnList, maybe they will support Nulls.
Whoa, this could lead to chaos!
Dick
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
