> WebMatrix or SharpDevelop? Even without those free tools, it's not so bad
> writing ASP.NET code in the editor of your choice, even Dreamweaver! It's
> a
> bit more verbose than CF, but I wouldn't call it cumbersome. ASP.NET 2.0
> is
> even more tag-centric than the previous version, and has some nifty
> changes
> to the "code-behind" approach of separating logic from presentation.
>
My point is that CF without any tools provides RAD capabilities, while Java
and .NET do not. Thus, I am making the assertion that if CF had the same
kind of tooling as Java and .NET then its RAD capabilities would be greater
increased. Do you disagree with this assertion?
-Matt
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
