>speed issue is gone, as are layouts (though you can still use them, if you
>want). I still use FB3 every day (using a slightly modified core file), and
>it's great. FB4 is way better. I still haven't really found a reason to
>modify the cores, there is just so much flexibility available to you.
Agreed, I realize that.
>Of course, that certainly doesn't make it the best framework for everyone.
>If you really want to leverage all it's got to offer, you really need to be
>using an MVC (or MVC-like) structure for you applications, and that's not
>for everyone. It's also got a steeper learning curve.
I am leaning toward eventually migrating to Mach II. My approach may be boring for technologists, but I am much more concerned about the business ramifications of changing frameworks than I am about the frameworks themselves. In planning for the future I want to consider 1. challenging and inspiring my team by giving them new and cool stuff to learn, and 2. providing my employer with business continuity. That's why I say pick a framework and stick with it.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
