On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:14:23 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 022 ?
>
> http://www.bu.edu/cc/support/aboutunix/commands/umask/
>

No, you wouldn't use the umask in this case. I think the previously
made suggestion of 755 is more than sufficient, and 744 might be even
better. That means that the owner will have full read/write/execute
permissions while the group and others will have read-only
permissions, which is perfectly fine for the purposes of allowing
downloads.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to