<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the advantage of tapping into JMS as opposed to using async cfc calls
> for a pure CF application?
If you have a pure CF app, JMS is irrelevant. JMS is useful for
passing data asynchronously between applications on different systems.
> This is an extension to Dick's earlier question about whether or not cf
> should have built in totally transparent JMS support.
Since JMS isn't even part of the core Java install, it doesn't really
make sense for it to be part of the core CF install (you couldn't rely
on the underlying Java system supporting it).
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
