On Aug 17, 2004, at 10:04 AM, Matt Liotta wrote:

>  I didn't state I wouldn't use this feature. I simply responded to the
> notion
>  that is an important feature. I don't think it is.
>

Matt

My opinion is just the opposite.

the Event Gateway decouples a cfmx app from the browser -- that means:

1) you can run a cf app anywhere that meets the requirements

2) The CF developer will be able to apply the CF advantages to a much,
much broader range of applications (web and non-web)

3) There are a lot of non-browser things you need to do when setting up
and running an application (define db tables, prime db with initial
data, backup databases, backup the site, dump/check-out portions of the
data for off-line processing, etc).  You could kluge together a
solution using CFMs and a browser, but many of these repetitive tasks
don't need (or are hampered by) a browser interface.  Better to have a
decoupled language with the power of CFML

CFML isn't perfect (yet) but it is superior to any scripting (and most
programming) languages that I have used (and I have used a few).  I
would like to see CFML become the lingua franca of scripting languages.

Now, where can I get a JVM for my iPod?

Dick
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to