invocation of CFCs? I remember you complaining about not being able
to to this without really digging really deep and that it really
wasn't recommened due to its fragile and tricky nature. Isn't nice
that MM has provided a public, documented and fully supported API for
interacting with CFMX via extenal Java code?
Sure, the event gateway is not the most wiz-bang feature in store, but
decoupling CFMX from the HTTP protocol (not the browser) and making
that lower level interaction simple and accessible is a very important
change.
Think about this... don't like the way CFMX handles webservices?
Thinks its buggy and a pain to use? Just don't want to use Axis
because you have a better idea? Write your own event gateway for
webservices and that utilizes some other SOAP engine. Want to
implement SOAP via SMTP which CF doesn't really do? Write your own
gateway.
Come on Matt. Java's great, but why bother with it if you don't have
to... especially if you can do it easier in CF?
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:37:45 -0400, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> matt,
> does anything make u happy?
> my god man
> what can we do 2 put some sunshine up yer bum?
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:03:56 -0400
>
> >> I'd already built a standard CF app that took XML files and imported
> >> them into Oracle Applications via the database. The event gateway has
> >> allowed me to receive XML messages asynchronously and use the same
> >> code to process them as I was already using for the XML files. JMS is
> >> much more reliable than shuffling files around and lets me process
> >> data in real time instead of using a scheduled task to poll the FTP
> >> server for new data files...
> >>
> >What about the event gateway allowed you to do this exactly? I can receive
> >XML message asynchronously now. I can imagine that the event gateway allows
> >you to do this more elegantly than current solutions. However, the only
> >missing piece currently is Java invocation of CFCs. It almost seems like
> >Macromedia went to far since the event gateway likely constrains people
> >where as Java invocation of CFCs does not.
> >
> >-Matt
> >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
