same results in MX if you are using functions... count(//*) works
great in BD not so much in MX...that being said if anyone has a work
around for it other than using Stuct functions on the XML object let
me know. I am working on an XMLsearch tutorial and I would love to
have a workaround for it in xmlsearch.
Adam H
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:32:57 -0400, Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's just that I've had so many issues with BD and functions. I seem to
> > have been forced to rework every single one of them in the move from
> > CFMX. They're all flying well on my prod server which runs MX, but they
> > fail on BD for any number of reasons. So, in the end, I'm not sure if
> > I'm going to be switching over to BD at all.
> >
> I'm not sure exactly what issues you are having, but my experience has been
> that it can indeed be a challenge to move over. I am currently working on a
> rather large application based on CFMX that we want to move over to BD.NET
> for deployment on .NET. I knew there would be certain incompatibilities like
> the lack of cfchart, which we use as well as other tiny details like the
> handling of GUIDs.
>
> These tiny details can be annoying when you first start the process, but I
> have found them to be quite beneficial in the end as the resulting code not
> only works on BD, but works better on CFMX than it did in the first place. I
> was so impressed by this fact that I know test all CFMX applications I write
> in BD as well just for quality purposes.
>
> -Matt
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
