> Sorry - no way I agree with that.  I'd say about 2 to 4 % of users
> ever look at the URL at all - let alone grasp the
> difference between a document and a string of variables. I would say
> that the difference is not only superflous but a
> red herring only noticed by developers.

I'd have to agree with Mark. Fusebox definitely has its detractors, but this is certainly not a reason I've ever heard before or one that really is an issue, IMO. I just can't see people judging the "professionalism" of a site on what the URLs look like.

I'm not the biggest fan of Fusebox by any means. But it definitely makes a lot of sense for a canned application. Even if you don't use Fusebox, it's worth learning and there's plenty of information out there, so you don't have to deal with learning some methodology that no one else uses. And there were many ways it really helped simplify things for my customers (not having to deal with different paths to images, etc.)
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to