Another advantage to BD is that you can sell to production Mac OS X
based clients -- this may not be a large base, but it is growing.
Nothing wrong with having more potential customers.

A slight disadvantage is that PHP, Perl, etc. come pre-installed on Mac
OS X.  But BD has a very simple install that makes it easy to get up
and running with CFML.

Dick

On Aug 20, 2004, at 7:05 AM, Ken Ferguson wrote:

> Well it's partly the curiosity, partly a sense of adventure, but mostly
>  I think it's the fame and the money. (stolen line from H2G2, but it
>  seemed to fit so perfectly!)
>
>  Really I just want to switch because, WHY NOT give it a shot. If I can
>  employ the free version when the application doesn't need any more
> than
>  that, then I can get people on smaller projects who wouldn't normally
>  consider ColdFusion due to cost that they can go with CF by using BD.
> As
>  far as I'm concerned, the more sites built in CFML the better. Whether
>  they run on CFMX or BD is largely irrelevant to us as developers on
> the
>  whole. The point is that some people pass on using CF in favor of PHP
> or
>  ASP due to cost, so now that I have a chance to test it out, I'll be
> in
>  a better position to advise people on how to use BD to develop a site
> in
>  CFML without worrying about the expense of the application server. The
>  CF dev community can only benefit from this, as all of those people
> who
>  have used the cost argument to say that ASP is better have now just
> lost
>  a large part of their argument.
>
>  Also, like I said, I've had a few little issues with some of my
>  functions in BD and I'm sending them over to the guys at NewAtlanta
>  today, but I'm actually liking it quite a lot so far. Even the
> problems
>  I've had have been pretty simple to fix.
>
>  ��_____��
>
>  From: Alexander Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:20 AM
>  To: CF-Talk
>  Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
>
>  At 11:09 AM 8/19/2004, you wrote:
>  >I didn't think it through very well before posting. I just got
>  >frustrated and asked.
>  >
>  > So, in the end, I'm not sure if
>  >I'm going to be switching over to BD at all.
>
>  Why switch to begin with? Do you need functionality in BD that is not
> in
>  CFMX, or is it the price of the license?
>
>  --
>  Alex
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to