On Aug 20, 2004, at 9:29 AM, Sean Corfield wrote:

>
>  > To me, it seems the missing piece is the ability to
>  > invoke CFML from other sources than an HTTP request.
>
>  I agree - and Ben Forta's tour report mentioned the ability to access
>  CFCs from Java. My reading of that is that such functionality would be
>  separate from the event gateway (but I don't have insight into the
>  product team's features so I may be off-base). It seems to me that the
>  ability to access CFCs from Java is a pre-requisite for event gateways
>  and I'd be very surprised if the only way to access CFCs from Java was
>  via the event gateway framework!
>
>  > While the event gateway
>  > will provide that, it seems it will also provide more than that.
>
>  Yes, that is my reading of what has been said publicly too.
>
>  > The reason I feel that way is
>  > because I think it is far too easy for the community and 3rd party
> companies
>  > to provide various protocol adapters. With a simple Java API for the
>  > invocation of CFML it would be quite easy for someone with Java
> experience
>  > to write these adapters.
>
>  I hope you're right. I don't see how it could be anything but
>  beneficial for CF to have community-developed protocol adapters -
>  either through the event gateway or separately. If the community does
>  a better job at creating a "gateway" framework than Macromedia, CFers
>  will have more choice and the bar will have been raised even further.
>  In what way is that a bad thing?

I agree and support the above paragraphs -- the event gateway will
provide an easy way to expand the use of CF to address a larger portion
of the total IT pie & play nicely within the j2ee environment (and take
on a bigger roll).

With the availability of a well-defined event gateway interface, Java
programmers will be able to extend or refine this method of invoking CF
code.

With the availability of a well-defined Java API, Java programmers
should be able to write a portion of their Java applications using CFML
-- this can only benefit both the CF and Java communities.

As an interesting aside, with both of the above, the use wouldn't
necessarily be limited to Java -- other languages/environments could
take advantage of the interface.

Dick
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to