>2. Redo your database with a proper many to many join. Otherwise, you're in
>for a world of hurt.

I agree that it should be relational bringing together several tables, which I discussed/learned here about a month ago.  But I was given no time to implement that so I'm trying to implement this temporary kludge with the hopes of doing that when I implement the USERS table for the site.

Am I getting what you're sayin?
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to