So you are admitting that the points used in your argument for not
using MySQL are outdated?

That's like arguing that you shouldn't use Windows Xp because of flaws
found in Wndows '95.   IF you are going to use data to support your
argument, make sure its accurate and up to date.

----- Original Message -----
From: Micha Schopman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:29:07 +0200
Subject: RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus out there?)
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

This listing contains some issues not affecting newer versions, the list
has been created some time ago and is indeed outdated on a few points
but for the overall ... it is MySQL in its current state. But the point
was more or less, MySQL does not contain integrity functionality, and
even if you use InnoDB which adds some of it, it is still possible to
workaround the constraints very easily. MySQL was never designed for
extensive use in company environments, it started as a personal database
system. Somewhat like MsAccess level at those days.

Micha Schopman
Software Engineer
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL  Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to