offers a little bit more than just the "cross-platform benefits of Java" -
there's also a wealth of open-source code and open-source modules available for
immediate use in applications built on the Java platform. I'm not trying to
detract from the New Atlanta angle that it's good to be able to run CFML
on .NET and I'm fairly confident that Vince wouldn't disagree with me about
this other benefit... I just thought I'd point it out.
~Simon
>
> They started using ColdFusion before Microsoft had ASP, or any other web
> technology.
>
> Vince Bonfanti
> New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> http://www.newatlanta.com
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 6:28 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Microsoft Case Study on BlueDragon.NET
>
>
> Congrats on your success and recognition. One question I had with the
> reply is if they were a Microsoft Shop, why were they on CF?
>
> Dan
>
> The "switch" is from CFML on ColdFusion to CFML on ASP.NET (using
> BlueDragon), not from Java to .NET. IntraLearn has always been a Microsoft
> shop, never a Java shop. By implementing CFMX on Java, Macromedia is trying
> to force them to become a Java shop; but they don't want to be a Java shop,
> they want to be a Microsoft shop, which means using Microsoft technologies,
> which means .NET and integration of ASP.NET with CFML using BlueDragon.
>
> If you're committed to Windows as your sole platform (as IntraLearn is), and
> aren't interested in the cross-platform benefits of Java, and don't want to
> deal with the inherent complexity of Java, then using ASP.NET and BlueDragon
> makes a lot more sense than any alternative for deploying CFML on the
> Windows/.NET platform.
>
> Vince Bonfanti
> New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> http://www.newatlanta.com
> _____
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
