I can see it being valuable if you've got a site with lot of static
content, because you'd probably want more web servers than you'd need
CF servers. With distributed, you could run several web servers for
the static content and have them connect to one or two shared CF
servers for dynamic calls. Distributed mode also lets a machine from
your web cluster die without affecting the app cluster, and the
converse, because you can load balance in both places separately.
cheers,
barneyb
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:39:02 -0400, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For split installs (web server and CF on different machines),
> > I'd recommend just installing the entire tree to both
> > machines. It's enormously simpler that way, and since your
> > web root doesn't contain any of the CFCs, there's no way
> > anyone can possibly call it.
>
> Out of curiosity, how many people here are using distributed mode? If so,
> why are you using it?
>
> Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
> http://www.figleaf.com/
> phone: 202-797-5496
> fax: 202-797-5444
>
--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com
I currently have 4 GMail invites for the taking
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
