Or maybe even consider not going down the Blue Alanta pricing, but
their own Flex pricing? Surely this would open up the gates a little?

As long as you can gaurantee (somehow) that the site is going to be
used for personal use (or charity etc) by giving the server away free
in these cases means that ISP can offer CF at a rate thats in
competition with ASP and PHP hosting.

I know that CF costs more to host, and i've seen the threads that
outway costs against development time. We all have. But i still know
smaller developers who would rather pay �29 a year
(http://www.web-hosting.uk.com/packages/) for hosting  ASP or PHP than
�119 (http://cfmxhosting.co.uk/index.cfm?action=services.hosting) and
get half the features. I know that development time levy's of the cost
etc, but to the small developer he see's his hosting cost in this
example as 400% bigger than if he was hosting with another language.

Andy
www.andyjarrett.co.uk

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:51:19 -0700, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do you think would make a difference? Or put even more bluntly, if you
> > were my boss and could dictate how I spent my time, what would you want me
> > doing to spread the gospel according to Saint CF?
> 
> What ever's going to keep MM going strong and CF becoming a better
> product is what you ought to be doing.  I'm convinced that's the large
> company market based on events of the past year or so, and your
> comments back that up 100%.  However, there's still a lot of little
> guys around in the world, most of which aren't going to be affecting
> CF's overall revenue in any significant way (what's $1300 every few
> years next to $50,000 for 10 clustered CF enterprises), but it still
> represents a significant portion of the developer base.
> 
> That developer base is a very valuable asset to MM's overall marketing
> of CF, more voices translates to more converts translates to more
> sales.  If the little guys start petering out for PHP, ASP, or
> whatever, suddenly there's a lot less noise being made about CF,
> except withing the tight circles of corporate IT departments.
> 
> This hasn't hurt Java or .NET in any way, of course, but it's going to
> piss off a LOT of CF developers who've invested heavily but have been
> swept by the wayside by MM, because they don't contribute to the
> bottom line enough to matter.  Java and .NET have a certain barrier to
> entry.  You just can't go that route without some real resources.  PHP
> takes nothing but hardware.  CF floats somewhere in the middle.
> 
> So along with provding for the future development of CF and MM as a
> whole, a nod to the existing user base would be nice.   How much do CF
> Standard sales account for?  Would dropping that price down by 50%
> have a huge effect on the overall bottom line?  I bet you'd get more
> sales if you did.  (Chalk me up for at least one, but for now, it's
> JSPs for me).  Hell, maybe even consider New Atlanta's route.  Take CF
> Standard, trim it down some more (no CFX, only Access and MySQL, maybe
> even single-threaded) and give it away.  With the unified codebase,
> you just change a serial to upgrade, and that's it.
> 
> I have no idea if any of that is feasible, or even reasonable, you'll
> have to tell us that.  But it some thoughts from a "little guy" that's
> seen MM ignore us more and more in favor of the "big guy".
> 
> cheers,
> barneyb
> 
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:51:30 -0400, Ben Forta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Interesting thread, on a whole bunch of levels.
> >
> > A few comments, and then an open question ...
> >
> > 1) Lots of messages imply that MM is not working on getting the word out
> > there. And I know for a fact that that is not true, it is what I do almost
> > full-time, and others work at it too. Maybe many are not seeing it, I'll get
> > back to that in a moment.
> >
> > 2) We are selling lots of CF. I can't disclose numbers and financials and
> > stuff without getting into all sorts of trouble, but I don't think I'll get
> > fired for saying that CF is indeed selling, and selling well.
> >
> > 3) What I have noticed is a dramatic change in who I am speaking to, and the
> > types of conversations. A few years ago I was talking to lots of .com
> > start-ups and developments shops and consultants and departmental decision
> > makers. I honestly don't bump into many of these anymore. But I do spend
> > lots of time talking to corporate decision makers, in the past few weeks I
> > have met with no less than a dozen well known very high profile
> > corporations, all using CF and lots of it. And this is reflected in the
> > types of sales we are making, and who we are selling to. With the changes in
> > CFMX, the maturation of the market in general, the tightening of the purse
> > strings and the subsequent trend towards consolidation and bringing projects
> > back in house, we are finding ourselves selling CF differently. Even
> > pricing, which some of you pointed out as an obstacle to CF growth, is in
> > reality not much of an obstacle. We rarely finds ourselves talking to those
> > for whom the cost of CF Standard is a deal-breaker, those who want to only
> > look at the initial cost. I can state quite emphatically that I have not
> > heard price as an objection in a long time now, not where we are finding
> > ourselves playing. The market has changed and space has changed.
> >
> > 4) Which brings me back to point #1. We are blowing the CF horn loud and
> > clear, but ads in trade rags and banners on coding sites and blurbs in tech
> > journals don't cut it anymore. We've ran ad campaigns, we know what they
> > cost and know how effective they are (or are not), and this has necessitated
> > a change in how we blow that horn (and where we blow it).
> >
> > And so my question to you is this ...
> >
> > What do you think would make a difference? Or put even more bluntly, if you
> > were my boss and could dictate how I spent my time, what would you want me
> > doing to spread the gospel according to Saint CF?
> >
> > --- Ben
> >
> 
> --
> Barney Boisvert
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 360.319.6145
> http://www.barneyb.com/blog/
> 
> I currently have 2 GMail invites for the taking
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's not only good for 
you, it's good for everybody.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=39

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182145
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to