thanks Mark >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:32 PM >To: 'CF-Talk' >Subject: RE: authorize.net processing > >Tim, > >Nope - you use the password in the old "3.0" implimentation. The x_tran_key >is created by you in the merchant terminal. You answer a "secret question" >and they use your answer to give you a hash or encrypted string. That string >is then used as your x_tran_key. This is the version 3.1 implimentation >(which you should be following). You can use AIM with username, password >and trans key - or just username and transkey (I think that's right). If >you want to change the x_tran_key - go to the merchant terminal, log in, and >answer the secret question you provided last time. If you have never done >this, use your username as the answer. > >-Mark > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:28 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: authorize.net processing > > >Mark/Damien... I'm reading thru the AIM PDF now... is the x_tran_key the >same as the password provided by Authorize.net... they provided me with >just a merchant username & password > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:35 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: authorize.net processing > >AIM stands for "advanced implimentation" and SIM stands for SIMPLE. If >you >are using the "advanced" connection method - where your web server makes >a >request and handles the response without the browser ever being directed >to >Authorize.net - then AIM is the one you want. Spend a little time with >the >AIM implimentation guide to familiarize yourself with the process. >Basically >you get back data in a delimited form and you figure out how the >transaction >was handled. > >-Mark > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:24 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: authorize.net processing > > >Thanks for the response Mark...Well... I guess for starters, >authorize.net gave me two sample tags cf_aim.cfm and a SIM tag... I'm >pretty sure I use the AIM tag for a Windows server environment... is >that right? Looks like the SIM tag relates to a unix environment > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:03 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: authorize.net processing > >What do you need to know? I use them for several clients of ours. > >-Mark > >-----Original Message----- >From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:36 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: authorize.net processing > > >Hey.. anyone have experience with the CF tags provided by authorize.net >to facilitate their CC processing - and willing to lend a hand getting >started to making it work? > >Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's not only good for you, it's good for everybody. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=39 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182803 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
