Honestly? I do. ;) However, I've been particularly up-tight about my code recently, so it's probably just me. However you're entirely correct that other checking must go on anyway. That's a great feature! I like it a lot!
Warm regards, Jordan Gert Franz wrote: >Well generally you are right, but who allways writes variables.name or >something like that. Even if you have defined the scope the checks still >have to be done and the engine has to check wether it is a valid scope >(or a structure or something else) or not. By configuring the scope >cascading to "strict" (see below), railo knows, that a variable without >a scope can only be found in the variables or arguments scope. And >please recall that in CFMX something like this (might be stupid) still >works: > ><cfset test = caller.name> If in the "caller" scope there is a form >variable called "name" CFMX will find this variable, allthough the form >scope is present in the current template too. You could also write ><cfset test = caller.form.name> > >Well exactly spoken in railo you can configure scope cascading in the >following way: >Extract of the railo.xml: > <!-- > scope configuration: > cascading (expanding of undefined scope) > - strict (argument,variables) > - small (argument,variables,cgi,url,form) > - standart >(argument,variables,cgi,url,form,cookie) > > cascade-to-resultset: yes|no > when set to yes, railo allows inside a <cfoutput >query="queryname"> and <cfloop query="queryname"> to call columns of the >resultset implicitly > > merge-url-form:yes|no > when set to yes all form and url variables are >merged into both scopes > --> > <scope > cascading="standart" > cascade-to-resultset="yes" > merge-url-form="no"> > >- Gert - > >-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Jordan Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Freitag, 5. November 2004 01:20 >An: CF-Talk >Betreff: Re: Bluedragon Server > > >Intriguing. I was always under the impression that if you defined the >scope in the first place, the same kind of performance increase would >occur? Is that not what happens? > >Thanks! Keep up the good work! > >-Jordan > > > >Gert Franz wrote: > > > >>hi there, >> >>just take a look at the performance tests we did with railo alfa 4 in >>comparison to cfmx. >>http://www.railo.ch/en/documentation/index.cfm?treeID=30 >>We have a lot of improvements and in railo and no big limitations >>(except for the couple of tags and functions that we still have to >>implement). Take the scope cascading for example. By turning it off you >> >> > > > >>can boost the performance of railo greatly. Scope cascading allows you >>to implicitly reference variables. For example you can write the >>statement <cfset test = Name>. The variable Name has no Scope-Qualifier >> >> > > > >>so Railo normaly checks the usual scopes (in a predefined order >>[variables, current query, form, url a.s.o.]) to find it. You can turn >>this behaviour off so that you have to write <cfset test = url.Name>. >>This leads to a large improvement in execution-speed. And adding to >>this the code can be easier read. Of course this is a (configurable) >>limitation, but with the advantages you get, you won't consider it to >>be a limitation. >> >>Check out www.railo.com for updates. >> >>We plan to release Railo Beta in the first quarter of 2005. >> >><cfregards from="Gert Franz" who="railo developer" >>location="switzerland" respondto="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> >> >> >> >> > > > -- Warm regards, Jordan Michaels Vivio Technologies http://www.viviotech.net/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:183443 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
